Other

experiment-detail-comparator

Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies.

86100Total Score
Core Capability
81 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
6 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
94Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies
4/4
90Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies
4/4
88Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments
4/4
88PDF → Markdown conversion via the mistral-pdf-to-markdown workflow for robust text extraction
4/4
88End-to-end case for Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability81 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for experiment-detail-comparator: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
A modest deduction remained in performance context for experiment-detail-comparator in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for experiment-detail-comparator under agent usability.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for experiment-detail-comparator in human usability.
6 / 8
75%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for experiment-detail-comparator in security.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for experiment-detail-comparator in maintainability.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total81 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 89.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

94
Canonical
Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies
4/4 ✓
90
Variant A
Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies
4/4 ✓
88
Edge
Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments
4/4 ✓
88
Variant B
PDF → Markdown conversion via the mistral-pdf-to-markdown workflow for robust text extraction
4/4 ✓
88
Stress
End-to-end case for Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments
4/4 ✓
94
Canonical✅ Pass
Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies

The archived run for Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers,... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 37/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The experiment-detail-comparator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
90
Variant A✅ Pass
Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers, identify protocol differences (ratios, dosages, timing, conditions), search supporting literature to explain why they differ, and generate an HTML report. Use when you need a parameter-level comparison of two methods and evidence-backed reasons for discrepancies

For Compare experimental method details between two Zotero PDF papers,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The experiment-detail-comparator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Edge✅ Pass
Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments

The archived run for Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The experiment-detail-comparator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant B✅ Pass
PDF → Markdown conversion via the mistral-pdf-to-markdown workflow for robust text extraction

For PDF → Markdown conversion via the mistral-pdf-to-markdown workflow..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The experiment-detail-comparator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by title/author/DOI, then resolve PDF attachments

The End-to-end case for Zotero-first retrieval: locate items by... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 30/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The experiment-detail-comparator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total89.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 81/100 and dynamic average is 80.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/6; adjustment=1. compare_methods.py: OK; convert_pdf_to_markdown.py: rc=1; download_full_pdf.py: rc=1; experiment_classifier.py: rc=1