histolab
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Lightweight Whole Slide Image (WSI) tiling and preprocessing for digital pathology, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | Methodological grounding was preserved through the documented inputs, transformations, and expected artifacts. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
The archived run treated You want automatic tissue detection to avoid background-heavy tiles... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Slide management via Slide: load WSI formats (SVS, TIFF, NDPI,... remained an analysis-style extraction path whose value came from structured data capture rather than a freeform narrative response.
This variant b case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
End-to-end case for Slide management via Slide: load WSI formats... remained an analysis-style extraction path whose value came from structured data capture rather than a freeform narrative response.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable