Evidence Insight

literature-filtering

86100Total Score

Core Capability

84 / 100

Functional Suitability

11 / 12

Reliability

9 / 12

Performance & Context

7 / 8

Agent Usability

14 / 16

Human Usability

8 / 8

Security

10 / 12

Maintainability

9 / 12

Agent-Specific

16 / 20

Medical Task

20 / 20 Passed

92You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)

4/4

88You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)

4/4

86Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

4/4

86Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently

4/4

86End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed

✓

Operational Stability

System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases

PASS

✓

Structural Consistency

Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format

PASS

✓

Result Determinism

Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs

PASS

✓

System Security

No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected

PASS

Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable

Dimension	Result	Detail
Scientific Integrity	PASS	The archived evaluation did not indicate fabricated or unsupported scientific claims in literature-filtering.
Practice Boundaries	PASS	The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation.
Methodological Ground	PASS	The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow.
Code Usability	N/A	The package is evaluated primarily as a structured deliverable rather than an executable scientific code workflow.

Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability

Related legacy finding for literature-filtering: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

11 / 12

92%

Reliability

Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

9 / 12

75%

Performance & Context

A modest deduction remained in performance context for literature-filtering in the archived review.

7 / 8

88%

Agent Usability

The archived evaluation left some headroom for literature-filtering under agent usability.

14 / 16

88%

Human Usability

The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.

8 / 8

100%

Security

A modest deduction remained in security for literature-filtering in the archived review.

10 / 12

83%

Maintainability

A modest deduction remained in maintainability for literature-filtering in the archived review.

9 / 12

75%

Agent-Specific

Related legacy finding for literature-filtering: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

16 / 20

80%

Core Capability Total84 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

Canonical

You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)

4/4 ✓

Variant A

You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)

4/4 ✓

Edge

Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

4/4 ✓

Variant B

Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently

4/4 ✓

Stress

End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

4/4 ✓

Canonical✅ Pass

You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)

You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100

✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant A✅ Pass

You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)

This variant a case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100

✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Edge✅ Pass

Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

The archived run treated Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100

✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant B✅ Pass

Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently

The archived run treated Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100

✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Stress✅ Pass

End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria

This stress case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100

✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Medical Task Total87.6 / 100

Key Strengths

Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable