Evidence Insight
literature-filtering
Filter literature by publication year, journal, and predefined screening rules to produce inclusion/exclusion lists; use when conducting preliminary screening or systematic review screening to narrow the literature scope.
86100Total Score
Core Capability
84 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
92You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)
4/4
88You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)
4/4
86Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
4/4
86Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently
4/4
86End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation did not indicate fabricated or unsupported scientific claims in literature-filtering. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The package is evaluated primarily as a structured deliverable rather than an executable scientific code workflow. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Related legacy finding for literature-filtering: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
A modest deduction remained in performance context for literature-filtering in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for literature-filtering under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for literature-filtering in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for literature-filtering in the archived review.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for literature-filtering: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total84 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
92
Canonical
You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)
4/4 ✓
88
Variant A
You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)
4/4 ✓
86
Edge
Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
4/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently
4/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
4/4 ✓
92
Canonical✅ Pass
You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year range (e.g., 2015–2024)
You need to quickly narrow a large bibliography by publication year... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant A✅ Pass
You must restrict results to a target journal set (e.g., a whitelist/blacklist of journals)
This variant a case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
The archived run treated Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names consistently
The archived run treated Journal name normalization to match abbreviations and full names... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Rule-based filtering by year, journal, and literature type/criteria
This stress case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-filtering output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total87.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable