Other

literature-management

87100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86You have a batch of locally downloaded papers (PDF/BibTeX/RIS/CSV/TXT) that must be organized into a consistent library structure
3/4
86You need offline deduplication using DOI or normalized *Title + Year* to avoid repeated entries
3/4
86Local-only import into a managed literature library directory
3/4
86Deterministic deduplication with clear priority rules (DOI → Title+Year → file hash)
3/4
86End-to-end case for Local-only import into a managed literature library directory
3/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for literature-management in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for literature-management under security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-management in maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed

86
Canonical
You have a batch of locally downloaded papers (PDF/BibTeX/RIS/CSV/TXT) that must be organized into a consistent library structure
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
You need offline deduplication using DOI or normalized *Title + Year* to avoid repeated entries
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Local-only import into a managed literature library directory
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Deterministic deduplication with clear priority rules (DOI → Title+Year → file hash)
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Local-only import into a managed literature library directory
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a batch of locally downloaded papers (PDF/BibTeX/RIS/CSV/TXT) that must be organized into a consistent library structure

The main issue in this canonical run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
You need offline deduplication using DOI or normalized *Title + Year* to avoid repeated entries

The main issue in this variant a run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Local-only import into a managed literature library directory

The main issue in this edge run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Deterministic deduplication with clear priority rules (DOI → Title+Year → file hash)

The main issue in this variant b run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Local-only import into a managed literature library directory

The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Local-only import into a managed literature library directory was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 71.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. import_library.py: OK