Data Analysis
meta-abstract-screener
86100Total Score
Core Capability
87 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4
86Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4
86Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4
86Packaged executable path(s): scripts/screen_paper.py
3/4
86End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision. Use when you need to filter literature for meta-analysis or systematic reviews
3/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a... and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | Methodological grounding was preserved through the documented inputs, transformations, and expected artifacts. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability87 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Related legacy finding for meta-abstract-screener: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
Agent usability was strong, but the workflow could surface its entry conditions a little more directly.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest security gap remained in the archived evaluation despite otherwise controlled workflow behavior.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with only limited room to simplify scripts, dependencies, or packaging structure.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total87 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
86
Canonical
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/screen_paper.py
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision. Use when you need to filter literature for meta-analysis or systematic reviews
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
The Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion... workflow is specified, but the execution example still depends on unresolved placeholders.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The meta-abstract-screener output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
The Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion... workflow is specified, but the execution example still depends on unresolved placeholders.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The meta-abstract-screener output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision
The archived command path for Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion... was structurally clear, yet still placeholder-bound.
Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The meta-abstract-screener output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/screen_paper.py
The archived command path for Packaged executable path(s): scripts/screen_paper.py was structurally clear, yet still placeholder-bound.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The meta-abstract-screener output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision. Use when you need to filter literature for meta-analysis or systematic reviews
The Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a... workflow is specified, but the execution example still depends on unresolved placeholders.
Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The meta-abstract-screener output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 87/100 and dynamic average is 72.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 0/1; adjustment=0. screen_paper.py: rc=1