Academic Writing
meta-results-risk-of-bias
91100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
100Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4
97Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4
95Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4
94Packaged executable path(s): scripts/format_result.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4
94End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics. Use when the user wants to draft the risk of bias analysis text from provided data tables
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity remained intact because the package rewrote or structured material without fabricating findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables... instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for meta-results-risk-of-bias in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived review left a small gap in how directly Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables... resolves into a polished dissemination deliverable.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
A small reliability gap remained around the more demanding writing-to-format conversion paths.
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The package guides agents reasonably well, while still leaving a little room for crisper trigger wording.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
Related legacy finding for meta-results-risk-of-bias: Minor polish before wide rollout. No major defects found
7 / 8
88%
Security
The workflow stayed safe overall, with only a small remaining deduction around boundary signaling.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with modest room to simplify or consolidate the conversion workflow.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent-specific quality remained high, though the archived review still left room for sharper trigger boundaries.
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
100
Canonical
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4 ✓
97
Variant A
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4 ✓
95
Edge
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
4/4 ✓
94
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/format_result.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4 ✓
94
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics. Use when the user wants to draft the risk of bias analysis text from provided data tables
4/4 ✓
100
Canonical✅ Pass
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
The Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 100/100
✅A1The meta-results-risk-of-bias output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
97
Variant A✅ Pass
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
For Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 97/100
✅A1The meta-results-risk-of-bias output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
95
Edge✅ Pass
Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics
The archived run for Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The meta-results-risk-of-bias output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/format_result.py plus 1 additional script(s)
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/format_result.py plus 1... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The meta-results-risk-of-bias output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables and statistics. Use when the user wants to draft the risk of bias analysis text from provided data tables
For Generates the "Risk of Bias" results section for a meta-analysis based on assessment tables..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The meta-results-risk-of-bias output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total96 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. format_result.py: OK; validate_skill.py: OK