metagenomic-krona-chart
Analyze data with `metagenomic-krona-chart` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Analyze data with metagenomic-krona-chart using a reproducible workflow, explicit..., not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not record a code-usability failure in the packaged analysis path. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 89.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Analyze data with metagenomic-krona-chart using a reproducible... as a clean in-scope run.
The Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Analyze data with metagenomic-krona-chart using a reproducible workflow, explicit... boundary.
The archived evaluation treated Analyze data with metagenomic-krona-chart using a reproducible... as a clean in-scope run.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyze data with metagenomic-krona-chart using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 89.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review