methodology-extractor
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived audit treated this workflow as hypothesis or protocol support, not as a source of validated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Batch extraction of experimental methods from multiple papers for protocol workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for methodology-extractor usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The Batch extraction of experimental methods from multiple papers for... scenario completed within the documented Batch extraction of experimental methods from multiple papers for protocol boundary.
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
For Batch extraction of experimental methods from multiple papers for..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Batch extraction of experimental methods from multiple papers for protocol was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review