nih-biosketch-builder
Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for nih-biosketch-builder in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged nih-biosketch-builder workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved as a clean in-scope run.
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved boundary.
For Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved boundary.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generate NIH Biosketch documents compliant with the 2022 OMB-approved was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review