Other

paper-tweet-generator

Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF, Word, or Text), highlighting specific product advantages. Use when the user wants to turn a document into a social media post or reading summary.

91100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
97Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF, Word, or Text), highlighting specific product advantages
4/4
93Generate Tweet Sections
4/4
91Generate Tweet Sections
4/4
91Generate Tweet Sections
4/4
91Final Assembly
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for paper-tweet-generator under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for paper-tweet-generator in security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for paper-tweet-generator in maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for paper-tweet-generator: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 92.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

97
Canonical
Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF, Word, or Text), highlighting specific product advantages
4/4 ✓
93
Variant A
Generate Tweet Sections
4/4 ✓
91
Edge
Generate Tweet Sections
4/4 ✓
91
Variant B
Generate Tweet Sections
4/4 ✓
91
Stress
Final Assembly
4/4 ✓
97
Canonical✅ Pass
Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF, Word, or Text), highlighting specific product advantages

For Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 97/100
✅A1The paper-tweet-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Variant A✅ Pass
Generate Tweet Sections

The Generate Tweet Sections path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The paper-tweet-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
91
Edge✅ Pass
Generate Tweet Sections

For Generate Tweet Sections, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 91/100
✅A1The paper-tweet-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
91
Variant B✅ Pass
Generate Tweet Sections

The Generate Tweet Sections path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 91/100
✅A1The paper-tweet-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
91
Stress✅ Pass
Final Assembly

The archived run for Final Assembly confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 91/100
✅A1The paper-tweet-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total92.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 81.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/2; adjustment=3. extract_pdf.py: OK; extract_text.py: rc=1