pathology-roi-selector
Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution,... and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review preserved a usable code path with named scripts, expected inputs, and a recognizable output contract. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.2 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need... scenario completed within the documented Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
The Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
For Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
The main issue in this stress run was: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 87.2/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review