Other

ppt

90100Total Score

Core Capability

83 / 100

Functional Suitability

11 / 12

Reliability

10 / 12

Performance & Context

8 / 8

Agent Usability

13 / 16

Human Usability

7 / 8

Security

9 / 12

Maintainability

9 / 12

Agent-Specific

16 / 20

Medical Task

20 / 20 Passed

99You need to generate a new slide deck from a topic, brief, or outline (6-10 sections) and want a consistent visual style

4/4

95You want to iteratively edit slide content and structure in code (projects/*.js) rather than in PowerPoint

4/4

93Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

4/4

93Built-in slide element/component types (e.g., comparison, timeline, stats, valueCards, quote, ending)

4/4

93End-to-end case for Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed

✓

Operational Stability

System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases

PASS

✓

Structural Consistency

Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format

PASS

✓

Result Determinism

Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs

PASS

✓

System Security

No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected

PASS

Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability

Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

11 / 12

92%

Reliability

The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

10 / 12

83%

Performance & Context

The legacy audit gave full marks to performance context for this package.

8 / 8

100%

Agent Usability

The legacy audit deducted points for ppt in agent usability.

13 / 16

81%

Human Usability

The legacy audit deducted points for ppt in human usability.

7 / 8

88%

Security

The archived evaluation left some headroom for ppt under security.

9 / 12

75%

Maintainability

A modest deduction remained in maintainability for ppt in the archived review.

9 / 12

75%

Agent-Specific

Related legacy finding for ppt: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency

16 / 20

80%

Core Capability Total83 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 94.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

Canonical

You need to generate a new slide deck from a topic, brief, or outline (6-10 sections) and want a consistent visual style

4/4 ✓

Variant A

You want to iteratively edit slide content and structure in code (projects/*.js) rather than in PowerPoint

4/4 ✓

Edge

Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

4/4 ✓

Variant B

Built-in slide element/component types (e.g., comparison, timeline, stats, valueCards, quote, ending)

4/4 ✓

Stress

End-to-end case for Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

4/4 ✓

Canonical✅ Pass

You need to generate a new slide deck from a topic, brief, or outline (6-10 sections) and want a consistent visual style

The archived run for You need to generate a new slide deck from a topic, brief, or... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 99/100

✅A1The ppt output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant A✅ Pass

You want to iteratively edit slide content and structure in code (projects/*.js) rather than in PowerPoint

For You want to iteratively edit slide content and structure in code..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 95/100

✅A1The ppt output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Edge✅ Pass

Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

The Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 93/100

✅A1The ppt output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant B✅ Pass

Built-in slide element/component types (e.g., comparison, timeline, stats, valueCards, quote, ending)

The Built-in slide element/component types (e.g., comparison, timeline,... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 93/100

✅A1The ppt output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Stress✅ Pass

End-to-end case for Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES = [...] in projects/*.js

For End-to-end case for Code-driven deck authoring via const SLIDES =..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 93/100

✅A1The ppt output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Medical Task Total94.6 / 100

Key Strengths

Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 81.6/100
Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. validate_skill.py: OK