radiology-image-quiz
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Use when creating radiology educational quizzes, preparing board exam questions, or... workflow rather than drifting into unsupported scientific interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for radiology-image-quiz in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged radiology-image-quiz workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Use when creating radiology educational quizzes, preparing board... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Use when creating radiology educational quizzes, preparing board exam questions, or... boundary.
The archived run for Use when creating radiology educational quizzes, preparing board... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when creating radiology educational quizzes, preparing board exam questions, or studying medical imaging cases. Generates interactive quizzes with X-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasound images for medical education was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review