sds-msds-risk-scanner
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review kept outputs in proposal or planning mode rather than presenting them as completed experimental findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for sds-msds-risk-scanner in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Extract hazard codes and safety info from chemical safety datasheets as a clean in-scope run.
The archived evaluation treated Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... as a clean in-scope run.
The Extract hazard codes and safety info from chemical safety datasheets path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Extract hazard codes and safety info from chemical safety datasheets was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review