smiles-de-salter
Analyze data with `smiles-de-salter` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | No scientific-integrity problem was surfaced because the package did not claim more than the available records, article text, or script evidence supported. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Analyze data with smiles-de-salter using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and..., not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review preserved a usable code path with named scripts, expected inputs, and a recognizable output contract. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 84.4 / 100 — Assertions: 17/20 Passed
Analyze data with smiles-de-salter using a reproducible workflow,... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The archived evaluation treated Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... as a clean in-scope run.
For Analyze data with smiles-de-salter using a reproducible workflow,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The archived execution for Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py failed for environmental reasons rather than workflow ambiguity: a required file was missing.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyze data with smiles-de-salter using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 84.4/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review