table-1-generator
Automated generation of baseline characteristics tables (Table 1) for clinical research papers.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | No scientific-integrity problem was surfaced because the package did not claim more than the available records, article text, or script evidence supported. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Automated generation of baseline characteristics tables (Table 1) for clinical research papers, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 82.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Automated generation of baseline characteristics tables (Table 1)... as a clean in-scope run.
The Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Automated generation of baseline characteristics tables (Table 1) for clinical research papers boundary.
For Automated generation of baseline characteristics tables (Table 1)..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 82.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review