Other

text-to-technical-roadmap

85100Total Score
Core Capability
84 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
8 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
90Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
86Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
84Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
84Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement
4/4
84End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart. Use when the user provides research proposals, experiment designs, or scientific text and asks for a roadmap or flowchart
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability84 / 1008 Categories

Functional Suitability
Related legacy finding for text-to-technical-roadmap: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The legacy audit deducted points for text-to-technical-roadmap in performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for text-to-technical-roadmap in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for text-to-technical-roadmap under security.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for text-to-technical-roadmap in maintainability.
8 / 12
67%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total84 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 85.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

90
Canonical
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
86
Variant A
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
84
Edge
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart
4/4
84
Variant B
Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement
4/4
84
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart. Use when the user provides research proposals, experiment designs, or scientific text and asks for a roadmap or flowchart
4/4
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart

Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 90/100
A1The text-to-technical-roadmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart

This variant a case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 86/100
A1The text-to-technical-roadmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart

Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 51/60|Total 84/100
A1The text-to-technical-roadmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Variant B✅ Pass
Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement

Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 84/100
A1The text-to-technical-roadmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Converts research text into a Mermaid technical roadmap flowchart. Use when the user provides research proposals, experiment designs, or scientific text and asks for a roadmap or flowchart

This stress case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 84/100
A1The text-to-technical-roadmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total85.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: No runnable Python scripts were available for verification