Evidence Insight
venue-templates
87100Total Score
Core Capability
87 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
88You are submitting a manuscript to a specific journal (e.g., Nature, Science, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM) and must follow its official LaTeX class/style and author instructions
3/4
86You are preparing a conference paper (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, CHI, ACL/EMNLP) with strict page limits, anonymization rules, and required formatting
3/4
86Template library for:
3/4
86Journal articles (Nature portfolio, Science family, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM, Springer/Elsevier/Wiley/BMC/Frontiers, etc.)
3/4
86End-to-end case for Template library for:
3/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path. |
Core Capability87 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
The legacy audit deducted points for venue-templates in performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for venue-templates under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for venue-templates in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for venue-templates in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior'. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total87 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.4 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
88
Canonical
You are submitting a manuscript to a specific journal (e.g., Nature, Science, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM) and must follow its official LaTeX class/style and author instructions
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
You are preparing a conference paper (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, CHI, ACL/EMNLP) with strict page limits, anonymization rules, and required formatting
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Template library for:
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Journal articles (Nature portfolio, Science family, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM, Springer/Elsevier/Wiley/BMC/Frontiers, etc.)
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Template library for:
3/4 ✓
88
Canonical✅ Pass
You are submitting a manuscript to a specific journal (e.g., Nature, Science, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM) and must follow its official LaTeX class/style and author instructions
The main issue in this canonical run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The venue-templates output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
You are preparing a conference paper (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, CHI, ACL/EMNLP) with strict page limits, anonymization rules, and required formatting
This variant a case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The venue-templates output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Template library for:
The preserved weakness for Template library for: was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The venue-templates output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Journal articles (Nature portfolio, Science family, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM, Springer/Elsevier/Wiley/BMC/Frontiers, etc.)
The preserved weakness for Journal articles (Nature portfolio, Science family, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM, Springer/Elsevier/Wiley/BMC/Frontiers, etc.) was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The venue-templates output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Template library for:
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The venue-templates output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86.4 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 87/100 and dynamic average is 73.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 3/3; adjustment=5. customize_template.py: OK; query_template.py: OK; validate_format.py: OK