Protocol Design
research-proposal-generator
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper.
87100Total Score
Core Capability
85 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
93Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4
89Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4
87Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4
87Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement
4/4
87End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because the archived workflow stayed at the level of study planning, hypothesis framing, and experiment design rather than claiming completed results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package remained on the planning side of the boundary and did not cross into clinical or diagnostic advice. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The package is evaluated primarily as a structured deliverable rather than an executable scientific code workflow. |
Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The archived evaluation left minor headroom in how efficiently the workflow handles heavier planning contexts.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The archived review left some headroom in how directly the workflow guides an agent through the planning sequence.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
Security scored well, though the archived review still left some room to make boundary language even more explicit.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
The package remains maintainable, though the archived review saw modest room to simplify or stabilize its planning logic.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total85 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 88.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
93
Canonical
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4 ✓
89
Variant A
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4 ✓
87
Edge
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
4/4 ✓
87
Variant B
Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement
4/4 ✓
87
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper
4/4 ✓
93
Canonical✅ Pass
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
This canonical case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The research-proposal-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Variant A✅ Pass
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
The archived run treated Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input... as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The research-proposal-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Edge✅ Pass
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget
This edge case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The research-proposal-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Variant B✅ Pass
Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement
This variant b case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The research-proposal-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper
This stress case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The research-proposal-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total88.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Protocol Design with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 80.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No runnable Python scripts were available for verification